Legal Opinion

City of Zanesville v. Rouse

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 2010No. 2009-1282PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.

Case Background

{¶ 1} The appellee, Ronald T. Rouse Jr., was charged with a misdemeanor offense of domestic violence as a violation of a Zanesville ordinance. The clerk of the Zanesville Municipal Court received the complaint against Rouse, but failed to date-stamp or time-stamp the complaint. The complaint is physically located in the record, but bears no mark from the clerk’s office indicating when it was filed.

{¶ 2} Rouse entered a plea of not guilty. Before his sentencing, he filed a motion to dismiss the charges against him on grounds that the charging complaint had not been properly…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Larkins v. BakerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. State v. OtteOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Ferrebee v. BoggsOhio Supreme Court · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Welsh Development Co. v. Warren County Regional Planning CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. City of Zanesville v. RouseOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Strother v. ColumbusOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. Foreman v. Lucas County Court of Common PleasOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. State ex rel. Parker v. BlackOhio Supreme Court · 2022

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API