Legal Opinion

Fulton v. Preddy

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1900PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Error to Lenawee; Chester, J. Ejectment by George Eulton and Minerva Fulton against Frank E. Priddy, administrator of the estate of Samuel B. Reed, deceased. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, C. J.

This is an action of ejectment. Both parties claim under alleged conveyances from Rhoda *299Reed, wife of Samuel B. Reed. ' Plaintiffs claim under a deed made by Rhoda Reed, executed on the 25th day of September, 1889, and delivered to Henry C. Smith in escrow, to be delivered to the plaintiffs at the death of the grantor. The defendant claims under a deed alleged to have been made to Samuel B. Reed between the years 1877 and 1879, and subsequently lost without being recorded. The jury found that this last-mentioned deed never existed, so that the case turns upon the questions of whether there…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stanton v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Taft v. TaftMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Wallace v. HarrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Dougherty v. RandallMichigan Supreme Court · 1855
  5. Price v. HaynesMichigan Supreme Court · 1877

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Kerschensteiner v. Northern Michigan Land Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Loomis v. LoomisMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Stamp v. SteeleMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Agar v. StreeterMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Eadie v. ChambersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1909

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API