Anderson v. Seropian
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff while in the employment of defendants.
From a judgment in favor of plaintiff for seven thousand five hundred dollars, and an order denying their motion for a new trial defendants appeal.
We epitomize the evidence, save, where it is necessary to set it forth fully in order to properly understand some particular point urged by appellants relative to it.
At the time, of the injury sustained by plaintiff, defendants were engaged in the city of Fresno in the business of packing raisins and other fruits, and in the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hough v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Illinois Steel Co. v. SchymanowskiIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- Conroy v. Vulcan Iron WorksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
- Eureka Co. v. BassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- Greene v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Henderson v. Los Angeles Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Devens v. GoldbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Smith v. HollanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Wells v. Lloyd IVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Valente v. Sierra Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.