Carl H. Wienberg v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
COLLINS, Judge.
In this action, brought pursuant to the provisions of the Universal Military-Training and Service Act, 50 U.S.C.App. §§ 451-473 (1964), plaintiff, Carl H. Wienberg, is seeking to recover back salary wrongfully withheld as the result of the failure of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to promote him in absentia while he was in the military service. Both parties have filed motions for summary judgment, contending that there are not material issues of fact and that they are entitled to judgment…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- McKinney v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Tilton v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Carter v. ForrestalCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- James E. Haynes v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Peters v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Allison v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
- Westover v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Speed v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Skrobot v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.