Legal Opinion
Church & Dwight Co. v. Russ
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana
Decided January 23, 1900No. 9,580PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAKER, District Judge.
This is a suit to enjoin the infringement of a trade-mark or trade-symbol, and to recover damages for its infringement. It is alleged that the complainant since July 1,-1896, -has been engaged in the state of blew York in preparing *277.and marketing baking soda and saleratus used for cooking purposes, and prior to that time its predecessor, under the name of Church & Co., had been engaged in the same business at the same place. On July 1, 1896, the complainant succeeded to the business of the firm of Church & Co., and to all its interest in said business, including any and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Canal Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Columbia Mill Co. v. AlcornSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Lawrence Manufacturing Co. v. Tennessee Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1925
- Layton Pure Food Co. v. Church & Dwight Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
- California Fruit Growers Exchange v. Windsor Beverages, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
- Enoch Morgan's Sons Co. v. WardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1907
- Northwestern Knitting Co. v. GaronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.