Legal Opinion

Fletcher v. United States Parole Commission

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 6, 2008No. Civil Action 01-0601 (JDB)PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.

Plaintiff Thaddeus Fletcher began this litigation while incarcerated for a parole violation, a term of imprisonment that he contends was imposed pursuant to federal reparole regulations that violate the Ex Post Facto Clause of the U.S. Constitution. His amended complaint seeks damages and injunctive and declaratory relief against the U.S. Parole Commission and various commissioners in their official and/or individual capacities pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388,…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Abou-Hussein v. MabusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  2. Wilson v. FullwoodDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  3. Anderson v. ReillyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  4. Stoddard v. WynnDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  5. Jones v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API