Legal Opinion
Gale v. North Dakota Board of Podiatric Medicine
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 25, 1997No. Civil 960295PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMANN, Justice.
[¶ 1] The North Dakota Board of Podiatric Medicine appealed from a judgment reversing the Board’s decision to place Dr. Brian Gale on unsupervised probation for two years for misleading advertising and for failing to meet the minimal standards of acceptable podiatric practice. We hold the Board’s decision did not violate administrative and statutory procedures and did not deprive Dr. Gale of due process. We also hold the Board’s decision is supported by a preponderance of the evidence. We therefore reverse the judgment and reinstate the Board’s decision.
I
[¶ 2] In January…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- First American Bank & Trust Company v. EllweinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Medcenter One, Inc. v. North Dakota State Board of PharmacyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Feist v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Saakian v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Singha v. North Dakota State Board of Medical ExaminersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Gray v. North Dakota Game and Fish Dept.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- McMorrow v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.