Legal Opinion
DeCastro v. AWACS, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 2, 1996No. Civil 96-1452PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KUGLER, United States Magistrate Judge:
Presently before the court is the plaintiffs’ motion to remand the above-entitled action to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Camden County. As explained below, this Court finds that the plaintiffs’ claims are not removable under the complete pre-emption doctrine, nor has the defendant met its burden of demonstrating that diversity jurisdiction exists. For these reasons, the Court holds that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the above-entitled action, and the plaintiffs’ motion to remand shall be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Tenore v. AT&T Wireless ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Larry Leonhardt, Dan Laursen, and Rick Rodriquez, Rodriquez Farms, Inc. v. Western Sugar Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Union Ink Co., Inc. v. AT&T CORP.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
- Spielholz v. Superior Court of Los Angeles Cty.California Court of Appeal · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.