Legal Opinion
United States v. 118/100 Tablet Bottles
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Decided May 18, 1987No. Civ. A. 86-1353PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING
SHAW, District Judge.
Now before the court is the motion of plaintiff, the United States of America, (“the Government”) for summary judgment. Plaintiff commenced this action by filing a complaint of forfeiture, praying for the seizure and condemnation of a specified quantity of drugs which were manufactured by Mikart, Inc. (“Mikart”) and which were shipped in interstate commerce at the direction of Marnel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Marnel”). Pursuant to an order of this court, the U.S. Marshal seized a quantity of 100 tablet bottles of Margesic # 3. Both Mikart and Marnel have filed a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Weinberger v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Weinberger v. Bentex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. An Article of Drug Consisting of 4,680 Pails, More or Less, Each Pail Containing 60 Packets, Etc., Pfizer, Inc., Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Ciba Corp. v. WeinbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. Alcon Laboratories, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Pro-Ag, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
- United States v. Seven Cardboard Cases of an Article of DrugDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1989
- United States v. Undetermined Quantities of an Article of DrugDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1987