Legal Opinion

Clarken v. Blomstrom

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1933No. 24674. Department OnePublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

Plaintiff brought this action in mandamus to compel the declaration of a vacancy in the office of school director and the consequent appointment of some legally qualified person to fill such vac ancy. An alternative writ of mandamus, directed to defendants, was issued by the court. Defendants appeared by motion to quash the writ and by demurrer to the petition. The motion was denied, and the demurrer was overruled. Defendants Blomstrom and Uden filed an answer which admitted, in large part, the allegations of the petition, denying only such portions thereof as were “inconsistent with the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kimball v. OlmstedWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Lynde v. DibbleWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  3. State ex rel. Forstell v. OtisWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. State ex rel. Dent v. McLennanWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  5. State Ex Rel. Van Moss v. SailorsWashington Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. VerharenWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State Ex Rel. Quick-Ruben v. VerharenWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Green Mountain School District No. 103 v. DurkeeWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Lee v. JasmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  5. GREEN MT. SCH. DIST. v. DurkeeWashington Supreme Court · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API