Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Forstell v. Otis

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1924No. 18593PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.

This is an action in mandamus. The petition alleges that the petitioner is the regularly elected councilman from the second ward of the city of Olympia and that he holds a certificate of election, under which he took his seat and represented his ward from the time of his election in 1920 until some time in January, 1924, at which time the mayor of the city refused to recognize the petitioner as councilman or to allow him to perform his duties as such, although his term had not yet expired, giving as his reason that the petitioner had moved his residence from the second ward. There are other…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. McReavy v. BurkeWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Yonkey v. State ex rel. CornelisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  3. State ex rel. Roe v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Kimball v. OlmstedWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  5. State ex rel. Heilbron v. Van BrocklinWashington Supreme Court · 1894

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. VerharenWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State Ex Rel. Quick-Ruben v. VerharenWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Green Mountain School District No. 103 v. DurkeeWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Manlove v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  5. State Ex Rel. Austin v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API