Legal Opinion

Imperial Finance Corp. v. Finance Factors, Ltd.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1971No. 5103PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

KOBAYASHI, J.

This appeal comes from the decision of the trial court that appellee, Finance Factors, Ltd., did not breach a fiduciary duty owed appellant, Imperial Finance Corporation, in securing an attachment bond on certain property for appellant.

This case was tried by the trial court without a jury. The facts are essentially as follows:

In January, 1967, an officer of appellant, Arthur Muraoka, acting on behalf of appellant, reached an agreement with Richard Kuga, a special representative in the insurance division of appellee, with regard to obtaining an attachment…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York v. Hilton-GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Low v. Honolulu Rapid Transit Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Herzog v. Capital Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Sands v. Eagle Oil & Refining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. First National Bank v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Porter v. HuHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Shinn v. Edwin Yee, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Associated Engineers & Contractors, Inc. v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Jacinta Yu Yu & Aas Corporation v. Albany Insurance Company Gre Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. MPM Hawaiian, Inc. v. Amigos, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API