Legal Opinion

Nulyne Laboratories v. Electro-Alkaline Co.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 2, 1923No. 1502PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, in a trade-mark opposition case, in which the Office refused to register “Chlorox” for appellant as a trade-mark for tooth paste, on the ground of conflict with appellee’s previously registered mark “Cl'orox,” for use on “bleaching, cleansing, and antiseptic compounds.”

*1000In February of 1915 the appellee, a corporation located at Oakland, Cal., registered the following mark and claimed use since Tuly 15, 1914:

According to the testimony of the president of appellee corporation, its preparation is put up in bottles, and…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Inquirer Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  2. Pease v. Scott County Milling Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1925
  3. Pittsburgh Brewing Co. v. RubenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925
  4. Rieser Co. v. NilesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API