Nulyne Laboratories v. Electro-Alkaline Co.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ROBB, Associate Justice.
Appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, in a trade-mark opposition case, in which the Office refused to register “Chlorox” for appellant as a trade-mark for tooth paste, on the ground of conflict with appellee’s previously registered mark “Cl'orox,” for use on “bleaching, cleansing, and antiseptic compounds.”
*1000In February of 1915 the appellee, a corporation located at Oakland, Cal., registered the following mark and claimed use since Tuly 15, 1914:
According to the testimony of the president of appellee corporation, its preparation is put up in bottles, and…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Philadelphia Inquirer Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Pease v. Scott County Milling Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1925
- Pittsburgh Brewing Co. v. RubenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925
- Rieser Co. v. NilesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925