Rieser Co. v. Niles

ROBB, Associate Justice.

This appeal is in a trade-mark caheellation proceeding, in which the tribunals of the Patent Office concur in the view that appellee’s mark should not be canceled.

Prior to the adoption and registration by appellant of the mark “Weneeda,” for use on a preparation for the treatment of the hair and scalp, appellee had used the mark “Venida” on hair nets and hair curlers. Subsequent to appellee’s entry.into the field, appellant used its mark on toilet soaps, lip sticks, talcum powder, rouge, toilet creams, etc.

The tribunals of the Patent Office did not find it necessary to…