Legal Opinion
Curtis v. Hannah
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided January 19, 1981No. 1-580A119PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTSON, Judge.
This case arises out of the granting of summary judgment by the trial court to the appellees-defendants, Writha Hannah (Hannah) and Connie Edwards (Edwards), in a suit by appellant-plaintiff, Charles Curtis (Curtis), to determine rights and compel specific performance in a land sale contract.
We reverse and remand.
The facts most favorable to the nonmov-ing party are that Hannah and Edwards signed a contract for the sale of land in which they promised to convey certain lands to Curtis. However, it is further undisputed that the two owners were two of a total of three tenants in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Huff v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1977
- Podgorny v. Great Central Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1974
- Hale v. Peabody Coal CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Central Realty, Inc. v. Hillman's Equipment, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1969
- Cavanaugh v. CasselmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Parrish v. Terre Haute Savings BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Skinner v. HaugsethDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Kruse Classic Auction Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- Allied Mills, Inc. v. P.I.G., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Ellis v. George Ryan Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.