Legal Opinion
Salter v. Salter
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided October 27, 1949No. 32701PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The general grounds of the motion for a new trial will be considered in connection with special grounds 3 and 7 dealing with the objection of the plaintiff to the introduction in evidence of the verdict and decree of June, 1942, above quoted, and special ground 8 complaining of the direction of the verdict.
The general rule of law is that a copy of a verdict or decree in an equity cause, unaccompanied by the bill, answer and other parts of the record, is not evidence. Mitchell v. Mitchell, 40 Ga. 11. Yet, where the only direct object to be subserved is to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gibson v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Clark v. BakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Holcombe v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Little Rock Cooperage Co. v. HodgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Mitchell v. MitchellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1869
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Sears, Roebuck & Company v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Reserve Life Insurance Co. v. PeavyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Salter v. HeysSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Newby v. ARMOUR AGRICULTURAL CHEMICAL COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.