Legal Opinion

Clark v. Baker

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 12, 1938No. 12206PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grice, Justice.

Defendants in error predicate their right to the relief sought on the assumption that the trustees of Mrs. Frances Whetham Clark are invested with the same right given her, as a legatee and distributee of her husband, the testator, under the eighth item in his will, to wit, to have the executors furnish her, not oftener than twice each year, with an inventory and returns of their acts and doings. Plaintiffs in error do not in their brief make the contention that such a right to demand an inventory and returns of the executors is personal to Mrs. Clark and one that can not by…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Cushman v. ColemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  2. DeVaughn v. McLeroySupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  3. Southern Express Co. v. HanawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  4. Woodbery v. Atlas Realty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  5. Fleming v. HughesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Company v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  3. Matson v. CroweSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  4. Claussen v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1990
  5. Goodman v. NadlerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API