Legal Opinion

Salter v. Heys

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 14, 1951No. 17353PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Almand, Justice.

The defendant in error, S. R. Heys, as administrator of the estate of Arthur B. Salter, has filed a motion to dismiss the writ of error because Mrs. Arthur B. Salter and Harry Kent Salter, heirs at law of Arthur B. Salter, are not parties to the writ of error; and the defendants in error being only nominal parties and having no substantial interest in the subject-matter of the litigation, a decision in this case would settle nothing as to the absent parties. The record shows that Mrs. Arthur B. Salter and Harry Kent Salter, though originally parties to this suit, were stricken…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Glaze v. BogleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Hill v. CoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  3. Darling Stores Corporation v. BeatusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  4. Mitchell v. TurnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  5. Adams v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. King v. PateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  2. Lexington Developers, Inc. v. O'NEAL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  3. Georgia Casualty & Surety Co. v. RevilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  4. Rossville Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  5. Rossville Fed. &C. Assn. v. INS. CO. OF N. AMERCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API