Legal Opinion

Larsen v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 20, 1932No. Docket No. 8512PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

The petitioners have applied for a writ of review to annul an award made by the respondent Commission. The record is very long; however, the facts pertinent to this application are very brief.

On December 23, 1924, while employed by Larsen & Larsen, the respondent Joseph Wellde was injured. At that time the New Amsterdam Casualty Company was the insurance carrier for the employers. Thereafter, on July 27, 1927, the respondent Commission made an award in favor of the employee and on January 31, 1929, it amended its award. By the terms of the last award the liability of the insurance carrier was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Herd v. TuohyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Osmont v. All Persons, Etc.California Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Lauchere v. LambertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Scamman v. BonslettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ringle Development Corporation v. ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Gobel v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Sutton v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Lyydikainen v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API