Legal Opinion

State v. Powell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 2009No. 80535-1PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairhurst, J.

¶1 —A jury convicted Jason Vincent Powell for the attempted burglary of his ex-girlfriend’s home. The Court of Appeals reversed the conviction based on the trial court’s admission of evidence under ER 404(b) that Powell ingested methamphetamine prior to the attempted burglary to show his mental state. At trial, however, defense counsel initially condoned the testimony and later objected only to question the witness’ credibility. We hold Powell failed to preserve his ER 404(b) objection for appeal and has *75failed to demonstrate any manifest constitutional error supporting reversal. We reverse…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State v. GuloyWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. LordWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. SteinWashington Supreme Court · 2001

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. State v. BertrandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  2. State v. GrimesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  3. State v. EmbryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  4. State v. FenwickCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  5. State Of Washington v. Raphael Anton HensonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API