State v. Bertrand
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtHunt, J.
¶1 Shawny L. Bertrand appeals the trial court’s imposition of legal financial obligations (LFOs) and an enhanced sentence following her jury conviction for delivering a controlled substance (oxycodone). RCW 69.50-,401(2)(a). For the first time on appeal, she argues that (1) the unanimity language in the special verdict jury instruction, asking whether she delivered a controlled substance within 1,000 feet of a designated school bus stop (RCW 69.50.435), was error, citing Bashawj1 and (2) the record is insufficient to support the trial court’s imposition of LFOs, especially its finding that…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. O'HaraWashington Supreme Court · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- State v. LundyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- State of Washington v. Joshua James ClarkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State v. BlazinaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- State v. GrierCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- State v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.