Legal Opinion
Arthur J. Freije v. United States of America, Alfred Sarno v. United States
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided December 18, 1967No. 6914_1PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McENTEE, Circuit Judge.
During the period in question in these cases one Saia was the operator of an auto sales business in South Boston. This business was licensed and apparently possessed the external characteristics of a legitimate enterprise. In addition to Saia, the defendants Freije and Sarno, were connected with this business — Freije as a finder of potential customers in the Manchester, New Hampshire area, and Sarno as a salesman in Boston. The record does not indicate that they had any status other than that of employees.
These appeals arise from the conviction of Freije and Sarno for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. S. Lawrence Kahn, Arthur B. Sachs and M. Prial CurranCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
- United States v. CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- United States v. TonerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- Abraham L. Koolish, David F. Koolish and John B. Carnell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. Rufus Eafie HarrellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Lawrence Charles KingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Frank SquiresCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- State v. StefanelliSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- United States v. Gabriel Infanti and Nathan KurtzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.