Legal Opinion
Ancile Investment Co. v. Archer Daniels Midland Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 16, 2014No. 08 Civ. 9492(KMW)(FM)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion & Order
WOOD, District Judge.
Plaintiff Ancile Investment Company (“Ancile”) filed the above-captioned action on November 5, 2008, against Defendant Archer Daniels Midland Company (“ADM”), seeking damages for alleged violations of Brazilian and state law. [Dkt. No. 1]. After granting ADM’s motion to *318dismiss Andie's state law daims, [Dkt. No. 79], this Court granted ADM’s motion to dismiss Andie’s sole remaining daim — alleging a violation of the extra-contractual duty of good faith under Brazilian law — on November 29, 2012. [Dkt. No. 121]. ADM now seeks to recover attorney’s fees that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Sun Oil Co. v. WortmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Troy v. RFD-TV The Theater, LLCCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2016
- Federal Treasury Enterprise Sojuzplodoimport v. Spirits International B.V.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- In the Matter of the Trusts established under the Pooling and Servicing AgreementsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024