Legal Opinion
Federal Treasury Enterprise Sojuzplodoimport v. Spirits International B.V.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 24, 2014No. 14-cv-0712 (SAS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
In order to determine whether this Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action, I must resolve thorny questions of first impression under Russian law. In earlier litigation among these parties, the Second Circuit ruled that plaintiffs Federal Treasury Enterprise So-juzplodoimport (“FTE”) and OAO “Moscow Distillery Crista!!” (“Crista!!”) lacked standing to assert claims under Section 32(1) of the Lanham Act.1 In February 2014, plaintiffs brought a new action against defendants, which include Spirits International…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Natalia Makarova v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Banco Nacional De Cuba v. SabbatinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Amidax Trading Group v. S.W.I.F.T. ScrlCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Federal Treasury Enterprise Sojuzplodoimport v. Spirits International B.V.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Fed. Treasury Enter. Sojuzplodoimport v. Spirits Int'l B.V.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Rodolfo Enrique Jimenez v. Luisa PalaciosCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2019
- Rodolfo Enrique Jimenez v. Luisa PalaciosCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2019