Legal Opinion
Reybold Group, Inc. v. Chemprobe Technologies, Inc.
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided December 22, 1998No. 248, 1998PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, Justice:
This is an appeal by the plaintiff-appellant, Reybold Group, Inc. (“Reybold”), from a final judgment entered by the Superior Court in favor of the defendant-appellee, Chemprobe Technologies, Inc. (“Chemprobe”). The other defendant named in the original complaint, Fountain Caulking, Inc. (“Fountain”), was voluntarily dismissed from the action before the Superior Court granted Chemprobe’s motion for summary judgment.
The Superior Court held, in a bench ruling, that Reybold could not sustain a cause of action for breach of the implied warranty of merchantability without proving…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Burkhart v. DaviesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
- MacDougall v. Ford Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Chudnofsky v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
- Money v. Manville Corp. Asbestos Disease Compensation Trust FundSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Sherman v. Del. Dep't of Pub. SafetySupreme Court of Delaware · 2018
- Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America v. WeismanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Freed v. St. Jude Med., Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2019
- Guinan v. A.I. Dupont Hospital for ChildrenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Don's Hydraulics, Inc. v. Colony InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.