Legal Opinion
Piantedosi v. Floridia
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 16, 1982PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
This appeal arises from an action on a note against the defendant as maker. The principal issue before the trial court was whether the plaintiff had accelerated payment on the note. If the plaintiff had exercised his option to accelerate, the cause of action would have accrued at the time of the plaintiff’s.demand, and the plaintiff’s present action would have been barred by the statute of limitations.
The defendant’s claim of acceleration is based on a response to an interrogatory in which the plaintiff admitted that a demand for acceleration had been made. The trial court concluded that the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Healy v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Storm Associates, Inc. v. BaumgoldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- DeLuca v. C. W. Blakeslee & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Hoenig v. LubetkinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Appliances, Inc. v. YostSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Bizzoco v. ChinitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Smith v. SnyderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Jewett v. JewettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Grayson v. GraysonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.