Legal Opinion
Grolier, Inc. v. City of Danbury
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 16, 2004No. AC 23988PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
In this tax appeal, the defendant city of Danbury1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court, claiming that the court’s determination of the fair mar*78ket value of certain of the plaintiffs real property is clearly erroneous. We affirm.
This tax appeal involves improved real property owned by the plaintiff, Grolier, Inc., and located at 8-24 Old Sherman Turnpike in Danbury. The property was valued at $17,662,600 on the October 1,1999 grand list. The plaintiffs challenge to that valuation was denied by the Danbury board of assessment appeals. Pursuant to General Statutes § 12-117a, the…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- United Technologies Corp. v. Town of East WindsorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Carol Management Corp. v. Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- First Bethel Associates v. Town of BethelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by6 opinions
- Narumanchi v. DeStefanoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Sakon v. Town of GlastonburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- National Groups, LLC v. NardiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Sun Valley Camping Cooperative, Inc. v. Town of StaffordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Nolan v. City of MilfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.