Nolan v. City of Milford
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, J.
The plaintiffs, John P. Nolan and Laurel Dixon-Nolan, appeal from the judgment of the trial court determining that the defendant, the city of Milford (city) overvalued their improved residence and land on Point Lookout and reducing their assessment from $2,546,700 to $2,066,880. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim: (1) the court improperly considered the city assessor’s testimony, which was biased; (2) the defendant’s appraisal report should not have been considered by the court because it did not comply with the uniform standards of professional appraiser practice; (3) the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Saphir v. NeustadtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- State v. BergerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Newbury Commons Ltd. Partnership v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Konover v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Xerox Corp. v. Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fairfield Merrittview Ltd. P'ship v. City of NorwalkConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017