Legal Opinion
Hill v. Donoghue
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 2, 2011No. 08-CV-1045 (JS)(ETB)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SEYBERT, District Judge:
Plaintiff pro se Demetrius Hill (“Plaintiff’) sued Defendants Richard Donoghue (“AUSA Donoghue”), Sarah Coyne (“AUSA Coyne”), the United States (collectively, the “Federal Defendants”) and others for violations arising out of an alleged scheme to record Plaintiffs jailhouse telephone conversations. The Federal Defendants are the only remaining defendants in this action, and they now move for judgment on the pleadings. For the following reasons, this motion is GRANTED.
*585 BACKGROUND
The facts and procedural history of this case are set forth in the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Contiguous Towing, Inc. v. New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- Andrew Valles v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.District Court, S.D. New York · 2026
- Fonck v. SempleDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
- Jones v. RodiDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
- Walker v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023