Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Carleson
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 3, 1973No. Civ. No. 13603PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERSEN, J.*
Plaintiffs appeal from judgment for defendant following denial of plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and granting of defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The trial court found no violation of regulations, statutes or the Constitution by the Director. This is a class action by five named plaintiffs who applied for ATD (Aid to the Needy Disabled, *56Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 13500-13801.)* The purpose of the ATD program is to provide assistance to persons who are both permanently impaired and totally disabled. (§ 13501.)
Each of the five named plaintiffs was found eligible…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- County of Alameda v. CarlesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- LeVesque v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Garza v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gore v. Board of Medical Quality AssuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- People v. Linda Q.California Court of Appeal · 1973
- Henderling v. CarlesonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Repko v. CarlesonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Millen v. SwoapCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976