Legal Opinion

Gore v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 29, 1980No. Civ. 56996PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HOLMES, J. *

Petitioner, a licensed physician and surgeon, was charged in a disciplinary proceeding by respondent board with gross negligence in his postoperative treatment of a patient, Doris E. D’Abusco, by failing to diagnose, monitor and take sufficient steps to remedy a fluid and salt imbalance in the patient. After hearing, the administrative law judge prepared a proposed decision, exonerating petitioner from “gross” negligence; but it was not adopted by respondent board, which rendered a decision finding petitioner “grossly negligent” and suspending his license for one year,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Moran v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Garza v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Franz v. Board of Medical Quality AssuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Decker v. City of Imperial BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Fontana Unified School District v. BurmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Kearl v. Board of Medical Quality AssuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Hatch v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2004

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API