Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Chandler

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided March 4, 1941PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

It is proverbial that hard cases make bad law. The learned referee to whom the issues in this proceeding were submitted for evaluation obviously deemed that a validation of the objections of the surviving spouse of this decedent would be inequitable, which may, in part at least, account for his attainment of a result with which this court is regretfully compelled to disagree.

As demonstrated by the record, the parties intermarried in or about the year 1910. Both were colored. The decedent was more or less continuously employed as a domestic or day worker for the entire period from…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Riggs v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Galusha v. . GalushaNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Boyd v. BoydNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Claim of Raymond v. Estate of DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Newman v. DoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1937

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of RandallIdaho Supreme Court · 1942
  2. In re the Estate of BarcNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
  3. In re the Estate of BrownNew York Surrogate's Court · 1952
  4. In re the Estate of SchwimmerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1944
  5. In re the Probate of the Will of LevineNew York Surrogate's Court · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API