Legal Opinion
Boyd v. Boyd
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 7, 1930PublishedCited by 172 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.
In Kings county is now pending an action for the annulment of a marriage in which this intervening defendant, Blanchard P. Atkinson, is plaintiff, and the plaintiff in this action, Isabelle E. Boyd or Atkinson, is defendant (Atkinson v. Atkinson, 217 App. Div. 96). Therein the issue is whether Isabelle, when she participated in a marriage ceremony with Atkinson, was already married to Robert H. Boyd, now one of the defendants here. It is awaiting a new trial and will be determined in accordance with the result in the suit before us. This one, in which Atkinson has intervened as a party…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Exchange Bakery & Restaurant, Inc. v. RifkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Prager v. New Jersey Fidelity & Plate Glass Insurance Co. of NewarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Forstmann v. Joray Holding Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Matter of FlaglerNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Atkinson v. AtkinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
3Cited by172 opinions
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Marshall v. LonbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Oregon State Medical SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Joseph Nara v. Frederick FrankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- State v. CowansOhio Supreme Court · 1999
167 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.