Legal Opinion
Valdez v. Mountain Bell Telephone Co.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided April 28, 1988No. 9789, 9793PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARCIA, Judge.
Defendants, Public Service Company of New Mexico (PNM) and City of Las Vegas (City) took an interlocutory appeal from an order denying their motions for summary judgment and joint motion for reconsideration. We affirm.
FACTS
Plaintiff homeowner’s original complaint alleged that Mountain Bell of New Mexico and PNM were franchised by City to provide service to residents of City, and that with City’s knowledge and consent, Mountain Bell and PNM negligently maintained a utility pole at the outlet of a drainage ditch near plaintiff’s property. Plaintiff alleged that the utility…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Goodman v. Brock Ex Rel. Estate of BrockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
- Phillips v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Hart v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- New Mexico Electric Service Co. v. MontanezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
- Westgate Families v. County Clerk of the Inc. County of Los AlamosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Schneider National Carriers, Inc. v. BatesTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Smoot v. Physicians Life InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- Townsend v. State Ex Rel. State Highway DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Yurcic v. City of GallupNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
- Jeffers v. ButlerDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.