Legal Opinion
Rowlik v. Greenfield
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 14, 1949No. Civ. No. 8936PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DELEHANT, District Judge.
In this action to recover damages for personal injuries consequent upon his being struck, while he was a pedestrian, by an automobile owned and being operated by the defendant, the jury, on April 13, 1949, returned a verdict for the defendant, upon which the court directed the entry of judgment. Although it is not relevant to the present issue, the court realizes, and here observes, that, in consequence of the collision; the plaintiff sustained severe, expensive and disabling injuries, some of the effects of which may well be permanent.
The plaintiff has seasonably…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Garrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
- Dowell, Inc. v. JowersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
- Callen v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- Rice v. Union Pacific R. Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1949
3Cited by11 opinions
- Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Aloysius Harkins v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Elizabeth Ferrara v. Sheraton McAlpin CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- John Dougherty, in No. 12678 v. Waterman Steamship Corporation, (Ryan Stevedoring Company, in No. 12679)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.