Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Illinois

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 28, 1988No. 86-5963PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

484 U.S. 400 (1988)

TAYLOR

v.

ILLINOIS

No. 86-5963.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued October 7, 1987

Decided January 25, 1988

CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT

Richard E. Cunningham argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Paul P. Biebel, Jr., Robert P. Isaacson, and Emily Eisner.

Michael Shabat argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Neil F. Hartigan, Attorney General of Illinois, Jill Wine-Banks, Deputy Attorney General, Roma J. Stewart, Solicitor General, and Joan G. Fickinger, Assistant Attorney General.[*]

2Opinion of the Court · StevensJustice Stevens

As a sanction for failing to…

Also in this document: Dissent · Brennan; Dissent · Blackmun.

3Cases cited33 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. (HC) Giger v. DiazDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  2. (HC) Kennedy v. BrazeltonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  3. (HC) Moore v. FrauenheimDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  4. (HC) Torres v. MontgomeryDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  5. (HC) Vasquez v. SpearmanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API