Legal Opinion

Sam Woodruff v. Rita Thames

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 2014No. 2013-CA-00815-SCTPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KING, Justice, for the Court:

¶ 1. In this real-estate contract case, the trial court entered a default judgment awarding specific performance in favor of the purchaser. The seller moved to have the default judgment set aside, and the trial court denied the motion, finding that the seller lacked good cause for the default and lacked a “compelling defense.” A serious question exists regarding whether a valid contract exists, giving the seller a colorable defense. Because the trial court abused its discretion by failing to set aside the default judgment, this Court reverses the trial court’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Guaranty Nat. Ins. Co. v. PittmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Rotenberry v. HookerMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Lowrey v. LowreyMississippi Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Facilities, Inc. v. Rogers-Usry Chevrolet, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2005
  5. H & W TRANSFER & CARTAGE SERV. v. GriffinMississippi Supreme Court · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Volovetz v. Tremco Barrier Solutions, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Jon A. Swartzfager v. Thomas R. SaulMississippi Supreme Court · 2017
  3. William Christopher Tucker v. Gay St. Mary WilliamsMississippi Supreme Court · 2016
  4. EMJ Corporation v. Hudson Specialty InsuranCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
  5. Wesley Health System, LLC v. Edward Lavonne LoveMississippi Supreme Court · 2016

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API