Legal Opinion

Jon A. Swartzfager v. Thomas R. Saul

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 2017No. 2015-CA-01187-SCTPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAXWELL, JUSTICE,

FOR THE COURT:

¶ 1. Thomas R. Saul and Jon A. Swartz-fager initially reached a verbal agreement for Saul’s purchase of a piece of property located within a larger tract of land Swartzfager owned. But another person came along and offered Swartzfager a significant sum to buy the whole tract. So Swartzfager approached Saul and asked if he would forego their original land deal and in exchange accept a separate parcel within a different tract of land. Saul agreed to Swartzfager’s new offer, and Swartzfager reduced their agreement to writing—stating that for “good and valuable…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. McNeil v. HesterMississippi Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Tideway Oil Programs, Inc. v. SerioMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Whitten v. CoxMississippi Supreme Court · 2000
  4. PMZ Oil Co. v. LucroyMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Leaf River Forest Products, Inc. v. FergusonMississippi Supreme Court · 1995

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Tunica County, Mississippi v. Town of Tunica, MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Culpepper Enterprises Inc. v. Joseph R. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2018
  3. Archie Beckworth v. Ann BeckworthCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2021
  4. Archie Lee Beckworth v. Ann BeckworthCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2023
  5. Candance Brown v. Mississippi Real Estate CommissionCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2026

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API