Legal Opinion
Corporate Dev. Spec. Inc. v. Warren-Teed Pharm.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 11, 1968PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
99 N.J. Super. 493 (1968)
240 A.2d 450
CORPORATE DEVELOPMENT SPECIALISTS, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
WARREN-TEED PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., A SUBSIDIARY OF ROHM & HAAS COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 2, 1967.
Decided March 11, 1968.
Before Judges CONFORD, COLLESTER and LABRECQUE.
Mr. Mark D. Larner argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Budd, Larner, Kent & Gross, attorneys).
Mr. Michael F. Spicer argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Jamieson, Walsh, McCardell & Moore, attorneys).
2Per curiam
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment setting aside service…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Higgins v. American Society of Clinical PathologistsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- Haldeman-Homme ManufacturIng Co. v. Texacon Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1964
- Higgins v. American Soc. of Clinical PathologistsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- ESSENTIAL CONST. v. Royal Concrete FireproofersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
4Cited by5 opinions
- Citibank v. Estate of SimpsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- Corporate Dev. Spe., Inc. v. WARREN-TEED PHARM.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- JI Kislak, Inc. v. Trumbull Shopping ParkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- United States v. Kolon Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2013
- Tatham v. TathamNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013