Legal Opinion
Corporate Dev. Spe., Inc. v. WARREN-TEED PHARM.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 15, 1968PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
102 N.J. Super. 143 (1968)
245 A.2d 517
CORPORATE DEVELOPMENT SPECIALISTS, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
WARREN-TEED PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., A SUBSIDIARY OF ROHM & HAAS COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted after Remand June 18, 1968.
Decided July 15, 1968.
Before Judges CONFORD, COLLESTER and LABRECQUE.
Mr. Mark D. Larner argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Budd, Larner, Kent & Gross, attorneys).
Mr. Michael F. Spicer argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Jamieson, Walsh, McCardell & Moore, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Fisher Governor Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Labbe v. Nissen Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Amercoat Corp. v. Reagent Chem. & Research Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
- Jaclyn, Inc. v. Edison Brothers Stores, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
- JI Kislak, Inc. v. Trumbull Shopping ParkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Schaffer v. Granit Hotel Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.