Tatham v. Tatham

The opinion of the court was delivered by

FISHER, P.J.A.D.

The parties to this appeal are Australian citizens, who, because of defendant John Scott Tatham’s work in international financial investment, lived in many places shortly after their 1992 marriage, including Hong Kong, Japan, and China. The family, which includes two teenaged daughters, moved to New York City briefly and then to Rumson, New Jersey, either sometime in 2006 or in *506the Summer of 2007.1 In the Fall of 2008, defendant returned to Singapore, where he has since resided; plaintiff Alison Tatham and their daughters remain in New…