Legal Opinion
C. J. Tower & Sons v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided February 5, 1934No. 3595, 3622PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRAHAM, Presiding Judge.
On April 22, 1922, the following order, officially known as “T. D. 39071,” was pro*439mulgated by tbe United States Treasury Department :
“Antidumping act, 1921 — Finding by tbe Secretary of the Treasury
“TI10 Secretary of the Treasury makes finding under section 201 (a), antidumping act, 1921, of dumping in the case of wheat flour from Canada
“Treasury Department, April 22,1922. “To Collectors of Customs and Others Concerned:
“Section 201 (a) of the Anti-Dumping act, 1921, provides as follows:
“ 'See. 201. (a) Whenever the Secretary of the Treasury (hereinafter called the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Lipke v. LedererSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Helwig v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Kleberg & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
3Cited by19 opinions
- Huaiyin Foreign Trade Corp. (30) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- National Labor Relations Board v. Botany Worsted Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- PQ Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- City Lumber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Huaiyin Foreign Trade Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.