Legal Opinion

Helwig v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 23, 1903No. 65PublishedCited by 108 opinions

CEETIFICATE FEOM THE CIRCUIT COUET OF APPEALS FOE THE SECOND CIBCUIT. This case comes before the court upon a certificate from the U nited States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The certificate contains the following statement: “ In February and March, 1895, Rudolph Helwig, plaintiff in error, made three certain importations of wood pulp into the. United States, entering the same at the custom house at the port of New'York.

Read the full summary

CEETIFICATE FEOM THE CIRCUIT COUET OF APPEALS FOE THE SECOND CIBCUIT. This case comes before the court upon a certificate from the U nited States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The certificate contains the following statement: “ In February and March, 1895, Rudolph Helwig, plaintiff in error, made three certain importations of wood pulp into the. United States, entering the same at the custom house at the port of New'York. As the facts are substantially the same in respect to each importation, except as to values, amounts, date, etc., they are spoken of herein as one…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice P-eckham

That part of section 7 of the customs administrative act of 1890, 26 Stat. 131, 134, which relates to the question involved in this case is set forth in the margin.

By section 629, Revised Statutes, subdivisions third and fourth, jurisdiction is granted to the Circuit Court of all.suits at common law where the United States, or any officer thereof, suing under the authority of any act of Congress, are plaintiffs, and of all suits at law or equity, arising under any act providing for revenue from imports or tonnage, except suits for penalties and forfeitures.

Under this section the plaintiffs…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lees v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Passavant v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Bartlett v. KaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  4. United States v. MooneySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Stairs v. PeasleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1856

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Hertz v. WoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. Rodgers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. United States v. Reorganized CF&I Fabricators of Utah, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API