Legal Opinion

Symington v. Walle Mutual Insurance Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1997No. Civil 960340PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Clayton Symington, Citizens Insurance Agency of Cavalier, and Steven Brekke appealed from a partial summary judgment declaring a farm property insurance policy issued by Walle Mutual Insurance Company did not provide coverage for the loss of Sym-ington’s feeder pigs. We hold the trial court did not abuse its discretion in certifying the partial summary judgment as final under N.D.R.Civ.P. 54(b). We also hold Syming-ton’s loss was not a covered cause of loss under the insurance policy. We affirm.

[¶ 2] Symington raised feeder pigs on his farm near Neche, North Dakota. In…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Union State Bank v. WoellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Northwest G.F. Mutual Insurance Co. v. NorgardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Walle Mutual Insurance Co. v. SweeneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hanneman v. Continental Western Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Martin v. Allianz Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Citizens State Bank-Midwest v. SymingtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Hansen v. ScottNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Victory Peach Group, Inc. v. Greater New York Mutual InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API