Legal Opinion

Smith v. Grove

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 24, 1941No. Civ. 11858PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

Claiming that a partnership existed between the plaintiffs, Robert S. Smith, Jr., and Rufus G. Thayer, and the defendant Marvin H. Grove,- the plaintiffs commenced an action to obtain a decree of declaratory relief, the establishment of the existence of the partnership, for an accounting and other relief. The defendants answered. In their answer the defendants set forth many denials and many affirmative defenses. A trial was had before the court sitting without a jury. The court made findings in favor of the defendants and from the judgment entered thereon the plaintiffs have appealed.

For…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. FarmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Dempsey-Kearns Theatrical & Motion Picture Enterprises, Inc. v. PantagesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. H. H. Worden Co. v. BealsOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Auditorium Co. v. BarsottiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Kloke v. PongratzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Constans v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. Smalley v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Denning v. TaberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Dills v. Delira Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Epstein v. StahlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API