Legal Opinion

Stephenson v. Lawn

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 2, 1957No. Civ. 9179PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs in an action brought against defendants as endorsers of a promissory note secured by a second deed of trust.

The evidence, which is without conflict, shows that the defendants sold certain real property to Donald C. and Wanda I. Lindell, and on the same date, and as part of the same transaction, the buyers gave defendants a promissory note secured by a second deed of trust. Thereafter, defendants transferred the note to plaintiffs for value by a special endorsement as follows: “Pay to the Order of Feed R. Stephenson and Edna M.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hatch v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Kinsel v. BallouCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Vandewater v. McRaeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Union Bank v. GradskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Wiener v. Van WinkleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Union Bank v. DornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Kass v. WeberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Roberts v. GravesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API