Legal Opinion

MONTAGAZZI v. Crisci

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 30, 2010No. 1055 WDA 2009PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

BENDER, J.:

¶ 1 Bruce and Mary Ann Montagazzi, Individually and as the Parents and Natural Guardians of Matthew Montagazzi, a Minor, appeal the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of all defendants on claims that they were negligent in failing to warn or prevent Matthew Montagazzi from lighting the fuse of an improvised explosive device that he and the minor defendants created. Detonation of the device amputated portions of several fingers on Matthew’s right hand. The trial court concluded that the minor defendants owed Matthew no duty and, in the alternative,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Carrender v. FittererSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Ertel v. Patriot-News Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Althaus Ex Rel. Althaus v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Gutteridge v. A.P. Green Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Kuhns v. BruggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HaskinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Newell v. Montana West, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Thompson v. GinkelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Sass v. Amtrust BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Commonwealth v. WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API