Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Haskins

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 12, 2012PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

WECHT, J.:

In this consolidated appeal,1 the Commonwealth appeals from the Court of Common Pleas’ July 5, 2011 order. That order granted the petitions filed by Appel-lees Esheem Haskins (“Haskins”) and Jerome King (“Bang”) pursuant to the Post-Conviction Relief Act (“PCRA”), 42 Pa. C.S. §§ 9541^46, and awarded each of *541them a new trial. Following careful review, we reverse.

In King’s direct appeal, we quoted the trial court’s recitation of the Commonwealth’s evidence in this case as follows:

On February 2, 2005, [King] came up from behind Nathaniel Giles (hereinafter, the victim) and,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AntidormiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. OrieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. KinardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Commonwealth v. NeroSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Commonwealth v. RoaneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API