Commonwealth v. Haskins
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
WECHT, J.:
In this consolidated appeal,1 the Commonwealth appeals from the Court of Common Pleas’ July 5, 2011 order. That order granted the petitions filed by Appel-lees Esheem Haskins (“Haskins”) and Jerome King (“Bang”) pursuant to the Post-Conviction Relief Act (“PCRA”), 42 Pa. C.S. §§ 9541^46, and awarded each of *541them a new trial. Following careful review, we reverse.
In King’s direct appeal, we quoted the trial court’s recitation of the Commonwealth’s evidence in this case as follows:
On February 2, 2005, [King] came up from behind Nathaniel Giles (hereinafter, the victim) and,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AntidormiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. OrieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. KinardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. NeroSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Commonwealth v. RoaneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.