Legal Opinion

Sass v. Amtrust Bank

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 8, 2013PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

BENDER, J.:

These consolidated appeals call upon the Court to address the scope and application of the federal Financial Institutions Reformation, Recovery, and Enforcement Act (FIRREA) to declaratory judgment and in rem mortgage foreclosure actions in state court. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, as successor in interest to AmTrust Bank, appeals an award of summary judgment in favor of Mildred Sass, which invalidated the mortgage and promissory note on Sass’s residence, dismissed Nationstar’s mortgage foreclosure action, and released Sass from further liability. Nationstar contends that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ertel v. Patriot-News Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa v. City SavingsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  3. Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Motorists Mutual Insurance Company v. PinkertonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Cheathem v. Temple University HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Affordable Outdoor, LLC v. Tri-Outdoor, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. B.T. Management v. 7065-A William Penn HighwaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  3. Cedarbrook Plaza Inc. v. Storage PartnersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Com. v. Nwani, I.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Crawford R. v. Grocery Outlet Bargain MarketSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API