Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Gore

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided March 29, 1989PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Martin Karopkin, J.

The defendant’s motion to dismiss the accusatory instrument filed against him as facially insufficient is hereby denied.

Following the Court of Appeals recent decisions in People v *107Dumas (68 NY2d 729) and People v Alejandro (70 NY2d 133), there has been a significant rise in the number of challenges to the sufficiency of local criminal court accusatory instruments. Due to the confusion generated by the subsequent litigation, this court feels that a review of the analysis needed to determine legal sufficiency may prove helpful.

In the present case, the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. McRayNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. DumasNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. In re Philip A.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. People v. CaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1977

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. VoelkerCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1997
  2. People v. Cibro Oceana Terminal Corp.Criminal Court of the City of New York · 1990
  3. People v. OrtizAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1990
  4. People v. EbramhaCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1992
  5. People v. AlexanderCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API